Blogs Best Mobile Data Providers by Connection Rate in APAC (2026)
Cover image

Best Mobile Data Providers by Connection Rate in APAC (2026)

Orestas Nariunas

Orestas Nariunas

|

December 16, 2025

Subheading:

APAC is the toughest region in the world for cold calling. Different telecom systems, inconsistent mobile usage, rapid job churn, and poor Western data coverage mean most “mobile numbers” never connect. This ranking focuses on actual connection rate — the percentage of dials that result in a real human conversation across APAC markets.

🧠 What “Connection Rate” Means in APAC

For this ranking, connection rate =

Answered calls with the correct person ÷ total dials

It excludes:

  • Dead or disconnected numbers
  • Desk lines mislabeled as mobile
  • VoIP numbers blocked by carriers
  • IVRs and switchboards
  • “They left the company” outcomes

Why APAC Connect Rates Are Uniquely Difficult

  • APAC ≠ one market (AU ≠ SG ≠ India ≠ Japan)
  • Corporate mobile usage varies by country
  • Job churn is extremely high
  • Local carriers filter unknown numbers aggressively
  • Western databases decay fast in APAC

That’s why mobile accuracy + local sourcing matter more here than anywhere else.

🧪 How Providers Were Ranked (APAC-Specific)

Each provider was evaluated on:

  • True mobile accuracy in APAC
  • Mobile vs desk vs VoIP tagging
  • Verification timing (at export vs static)
  • Role freshness
  • Observed connect % across AU, SG, HK, India, SEA
  • Dialer readiness for APAC calling

🥇 1. A-Leads.co — Highest APAC Connection Rates (2026)

Typical APAC connection rate: 15–27%

Why A-Leads is #1 in APAC:

A-Leads treats APAC as multiple local markets, not a checkbox. Mobile numbers are verified right before delivery, phone types are tagged correctly, and stale roles are filtered out — which is critical for APAC connect rates.

Why A-Leads Delivers Higher APAC Connect %

  • Export-time mobile verification (critical in high-churn markets)
  • Clear phone-type tagging (mobile ≠ desk ≠ VoIP)
  • Local sourcing across AU, NZ, SG, HK, India, SEA
  • Role-current contacts (fewer “wrong person” calls)
  • Avoids recycled Western datasets dumped into APAC
  • CRM-ready delivery (Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach, Close, Smartlead)
  • Pay only for valid, callable mobile numbers

Observed outcome:

More real conversations with fewer dials — even in difficult APAC markets.

📞 Test 50 verified APAC mobile leads →

🥈 2. ZoomInfo — Limited APAC Connect Consistency

Typical APAC connection rate: 9–15%

Strengths:

  • Some coverage in AU & SG
  • Strong firmographics for multinationals

Why connect rates drop:

  • Thin local data depth
  • Numbers often outdated
  • Desk/mobile confusion
  • Western refresh cycles lag APAC reality

Best for:

Research, not phone-first outbound in APAC.

🥉 3. Cognism — EU-Strong, APAC-Weak

Typical APAC connection rate: 8–14%

Strengths:

  • GDPR-safe methodology
  • Cleaner data where coverage exists

Limitations:

  • APAC coverage shallow
  • Mostly multinational HQ contacts
  • Limited SEA and India depth

Best for:

Calling APAC offices of EU companies.

🔹 4. SalesIntel — Decent with Intent Layering

Typical APAC connection rate: 7–13%

Pros:

  • Intent + technographics
  • Better accuracy in mid-market global accounts

Cons:

  • Mobile depth uneven
  • Verification not real-time
  • Connect % varies by country

Best for:

Cautious calling with intent filters.

🔹 5. Apollo.io — High Volume, Lower APAC Connect %

Typical APAC connection rate: 6–11%

Why it struggles:

  • Weak local mobile classification
  • High bounce and disconnect rates
  • Role churn poorly handled

Best for:

Budget teams testing APAC markets.

🔹 6. Kaspr.io — LinkedIn-Heavy APAC Markets

Typical APAC connection rate: 6–10%

Strengths:

  • Better in AU, SG, HK
  • Cleaner than scraping tools

Limitations:

  • No export-time verification
  • Not scalable for dialers

Best for:

Manual SDR workflows.

🔹 7. Lusha — Lookup Tool, Not Dialer-Ready

Typical APAC connection rate: 5–9%

Issues:

  • No mobile validation
  • Desk/mobile confusion
  • Better for lookup than campaigns

Best for:

One-off prospect research.

🔹 8. UpLead — Entry-Level APAC Data

Typical APAC connection rate: 4–8%

Limitations:

  • No live verification
  • Thin coverage outside Tier-1 cities
  • Not optimized for calling

Best for:

Very early outbound experiments.

🔹 9. Seamless.ai — Low Connect, High Waste

Typical APAC connection rate: 3–7%

Problems:

  • Aggressive scraping
  • High dead-line rate
  • Poor local carrier handling

Best for:

Not recommended for APAC cold calling.

🔹 10. Adapt.io — Research Only

Typical APAC connection rate: 2–5%

Why it ranks last:

  • Weak mobile accuracy
  • No verification
  • Not built for outbound calling

Best for:

Contact research only.

📉 Why APAC Connection Rates Collapse with Most Vendors

APAC connect % drops when:

  • Western datasets are reused
  • Desk numbers are mislabeled as mobiles
  • Numbers aren’t verified before delivery
  • Roles change rapidly
  • SDRs dial without country-specific context

🧠 Why A-Leads Wins APAC Cold Calling

A-Leads enforces one rule:

If a rep dials it, it should ring a real person.

That means:

  • Verification right before delivery
  • Correct phone-type tagging
  • Local APAC sourcing
  • Role freshness
  • CRM-ready routing

Result: the highest mobile connection rates in APAC.

📞 Test 50 verified APAC mobile leads →

Keep on Reading

CSV Leads vs CRM-Ready Leads: What Actually Converts in 2026

December 16, 2025

Why CRM Imports Fail (And How Bad Data Breaks Pipelines)

December 16, 2025

Best CRM-Ready Data Providers for Salesforce (2026)

December 16, 2025
glow effect glow effect

Get 50 Free Leads Instantly!

Sign up now and kickstart your journey with 50 free leads. Experience the power of A-Leads and see the results for yourself—no strings attached!