Subheading:
North America (USA + Canada) is the most over-dialed outbound market in the world. Spam filtering, VoIP masking, recycled databases, and role churn mean most “mobile numbers” never reach a real person. This ranking focuses on actual connection rate — the percentage of dials that result in a real human conversation.
🧠 What “Connection Rate” Means in North America
For this ranking, connection rate =
Answered calls with the correct person ÷ total dials
It excludes:
- Disconnected numbers
- Desk lines mislabeled as mobile
- VoIP numbers flagged by carriers
- IVRs, switchboards, spam traps
- “This person no longer works here” calls
Why NA Connect Rates Are Brutal in 2026
- Carrier-level spam blocking is aggressive
- VoIP numbers are heavily filtered
- The same data is resold to hundreds of teams
- Mobile vs desk mislabeling is widespread
- Buyers are trained to ignore unknown numbers
That’s why mobile accuracy + verification timing matter more than sheer volume.
🧪 How Providers Were Ranked (NA-Specific)
Each provider was evaluated on:
- True mobile accuracy in the USA + Canada
- Mobile vs desk vs VoIP tagging
- Verification timing (at export vs static)
- Role freshness
- Observed connect % in dialer campaigns
- Rep efficiency (dials → conversations)
These rankings reflect real outbound results, not marketing claims.
🥇 1. A-Leads.co — Highest Connection Rates in North America (2026)
Typical NA connection rate: 18–30%
Why A-Leads is #1 in NA:
A-Leads verifies mobile numbers right before delivery, filters out VoIP and desk lines, and ensures contacts are role-current — exactly what North American cold calling requires to connect.
Why A-Leads Delivers Higher NA Connect %
- Export-time mobile verification (not quarterly refreshes)
- Clear phone-type tagging (mobile ≠ desk ≠ VoIP)
- U.S. + Canada-specific sourcing
- Role freshness (fewer “wrong person” calls)
- Avoids oversold, over-dialed datasets
- CRM-ready delivery (Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach, Close, Smartlead)
- Pay only for valid, callable mobile numbers
Observed outcome:
More conversations per rep, fewer wasted dials, higher meetings per 100 calls.
📞 Test 50 verified NA mobile leads →
🥈 2. ZoomInfo — Scale Without Consistent Connect %
Typical NA connection rate: 11–18%
Strengths:
- Massive NA dataset
- Strong firmographics and org charts
Why connect rates vary:
- Desk numbers mislabeled as “direct”
- Numbers often months old
- Heavy dataset reuse → call fatigue
Best for:
Research and enrichment, not phone-first outbound.
🥉 3. SalesIntel — Decent with Intent Layering
Typical NA connection rate: 10–16%
Pros:
- Intent + technographic overlays
- Better mid-market accuracy than many vendors
Cons:
- Verification not real-time
- Mobile depth thinner than top providers
Best for:
Teams combining intent with cautious calling.
🔹 4. Cognism — Moderate NA Performance
Typical NA connection rate: 9–15%
Strengths:
- Cleaner than many global datasets
- Compliance-aware sourcing
Limitations:
- Stronger in EU than NA
- Mobile classification still imperfect
Best for:
Global teams with mixed EU/NA calling.
🔹 5. Apollo.io — High Volume, Lower NA Connect %
Typical NA connection rate: 7–13%
Why it underperforms:
- Weak mobile vs desk distinction
- Verification inconsistent
- Higher VoIP contamination
Best for:
Budget teams willing to dial more to connect less.
🔹 6. Lusha — Lookup Tool, Not Dialer-Ready
Typical NA connection rate: 6–11%
Issues:
- No export-time verification
- Mobile accuracy varies
- Better for lookup than campaigns
Best for:
Manual prospect research.
🔹 7. Kaspr.io — LinkedIn-Driven NA Mobile
Typical NA connection rate: 6–10%
Strengths:
- Cleaner than scraping tools
- Useful for enterprise roles
Limitations:
- Not scalable
- No live verification
Best for:
Manual SDR workflows.
🔹 8. UpLead — Entry-Level NA Data
Typical NA connection rate: 5–9%
Limitations:
- No real-time verification
- Desk/mobile confusion
- Not optimized for calling
Best for:
Early outbound experiments.
🔹 9. Seamless.ai — Low Connect, High Waste
Typical NA connection rate: 3–7%
Problems:
- Aggressive scraping
- High dead-line rates
- VoIP numbers flagged by carriers
Best for:
Not recommended for cold calling.
🔹 10. Adapt.io — Research Only
Typical NA connection rate: 2–5%
Why it ranks last:
- Weak mobile accuracy
- No verification
- Not built for dialer-based outbound
Best for:
Contact research only.
📉 Why NA Connection Rates Collapse with Most Vendors
NA connect % drops when:
- Desk phones are labeled as mobiles
- Numbers aren’t verified before delivery
- VoIP slips into datasets
- Data is oversold across too many teams
- Reps dial without timing or role context
Most vendors optimize for database size.
Connection rate optimizes for truth, freshness, and filtering.
🧠 Why A-Leads Wins NA Cold Calling
A-Leads enforces one rule:
If a rep dials it, it should ring a real person.
That means:
- Verification right before delivery
- Accurate phone-type tagging
- NA-specific sourcing
- Role freshness
- CRM-ready routing
Result: the highest mobile connection rates in North America.
