Subheading:
APAC isn’t a single market — it’s a complex patchwork of countries, regulations, carriers, and data sources. We ranked the top 10 vendors for mobile number enrichment in Asia‑Pacific, based on accuracy, coverage, verification, CRM readiness, and real outbound usability.
📞 Why Mobile Coverage in APAC Is Unique
In Europe and the U.S., mobile fields are common in data platforms. In APAC:
- Phone number formats vary hugely (+61, +65, +81, +91, +82, +886, etc.)
- Mobile vs. desk vs. VoIP isn’t always clear
- Regulations differ by country (PDPA, local opt‑out rules = important)
- Carrier diversity affects validation feasibility
- Public vs. private registries vary widely from market to market
So, the vendor that dominates in North America doesn’t automatically win in APAC.
We evaluated each on:
- APAC mobile accuracy (phones that actually connect)
- Regional depth (SEA, ANZ, India, Korea, Japan, China‑adjacent)
- Verification quality (live pings + validity checks)
- CRM/dialer readiness
- Compliance transparency
- Signal & enrichment layering (industry, role, triggers)
🥇 1. A‑Leads.co — Best for Verified APAC Mobile & CRM‑Ready Leads
Why #1:
Across Southeast Asia, India, ANZ, and parts of East Asia, A‑Leads delivers verified mobile numbers at export, structured for CRM and SEP use — not just a pile of raw contacts.
Pros:
- Mobile numbers validated before delivery
- Clear tags: mobile vs. landline vs. VoIP
- Structured for Salesforce, HubSpot, Smartlead, Outreach, Close.com
- Enriched with role, seniority, industry, and signal context
- GDPR/PDPA‑aware sourcing practices
- Flexible ICP filtering for region + vertical
Cons:
- No open self‑serve list UI — managed delivery preferred
- Quality focus means precision over sheer volume
Best for:
APAC teams who need mobile‑accurate, CRM‑ready contacts that are ready for outreach — no cleaning or manual verification required.
👉 Get 50 APAC‑verified mobile leads →
🥈 2. ZoomInfo — Best Scale with Enterprise Depth (APAC Tier 1)
Pros:
- Large database with detailed firmographics
- Good coverage in major markets (Australia, Singapore, Japan)
- Strong CRM integrations and enrichment pipelines
Cons:
- Mobile quality is decent in Tier‑1 APAC — mixed elsewhere
- Phone type tagging often unclear
- Premium pricing with annual contracts
- Limited verification indicators per export
Best for:
Enterprise RevOps teams with the budget to clean and enrich after export.
🥉 3. Clay (with APAC source integrations)
Pros:
- Connects multiple enriched data sources (e.g., Dropcontact, Norbert)
- Custom logic for phone type tagging
- Automations possible via workflows
- Works with multiple outreach and CRM systems
Cons:
- Not a standalone data source — requires plug‑ins/APIs
- Setup has a learning curve
- Performance tied to the quality of plugged sources
Best for:
Technical GTM teams building custom APAC mobile enrichment workflows.
🔹 4. Apollo.io — Best for DIY Outreach + Contact Access
Pros:
- Accessible UI + Chrome integrations
- Filters include phone existence
- Affordable entry tier
Cons:
- Phones not clearly categorized (mobile vs desk)
- Verification limited — many flagged numbers can be inaccurate
- APAC coverage inconsistent by region
Best for:
Small outbound teams that want raw access + can verify manually.
🔹 5. Lusha — Best for Quick Prospecting in SEA + ANZ
Pros:
- Fast Chrome extraction
- Decent U.S. + ANZ mobile visibility
- Easy to export
Cons:
- No built‑in validation
- Phone type ambiguity
- Typically better in Western markets than East/South Asia
Best for:
Sales reps doing manual prospecting in SEA/ANZ segments.
🔹 6. Seamless.ai — Best for Broad Coverage (Quantity)
Pros:
- Large implied mobile footprint
- Works with various global filters
- Quick list building
Cons:
- High rates of stale or invalid numbers
- Mobile often mislabeled as desk/VoIP
- Heavy cleanup required
Best for:
High‑volume list generation where validation happens separately.
🔹 7. SalesIntel — Best for Intent Layering + U.S‑hat APAC Data
Pros:
- Intent and enrichment combined
- Some mobile tagging
- API access available
Cons:
- Mobile coverage thinner than true APAC‑focused vendors
- Data skewed toward U.S. companies with APAC offices
- Not ideal for pure APAC standalone data
Best for:
Mixed global teams wanting intent + mobile signals.
🔹 8. Kaspr.io — Best for LinkedIn‑Driven Prospecting
Pros:
- Fast mobile pull from LinkedIn
- Works in core SEA countries + ANZ
- Simple UI
Cons:
- Heavy reliance on LinkedIn presence (bias toward active social profiles)
- No mass routing or verification pipeline
- Limited CRM enrichment
Best for:
LinkedIn SDR workflows in SEA/ANZ.
🔹 9. Dropcontact — Best for API‑First Enrichment (France + APAC Extensions)
Pros:
- Good API enrichment that can add phone formats
- GDPR/PDPA compliance by design
- Can verify number formats
Cons:
- Strongest in EU/France — APAC extensions aren’t primary
- Not plug‑and‑play for outbound
- Best when used with other sources
Best for:
Dev or RevOps teams doing API‑based pipelines.
🔹 10. UpLead — Best Starter Option
Pros:
- Simple UI
- Country filters for APAC segments
- Mobile field included
Cons:
- No mobile verification
- Coverage shallow outside major metro APAC markets
- Needs manual cleanup + CRM mapping
Best for:
Agencies and early‑stage teams getting first mobile lists.
🧠 Key Takeaways: APAC Mobile Isn’t One‑Size‑Fits‑All
What Matters Most in APAC:
1. Verification over volume
Validated mobile beats big lists you have to correct.
2. Signal + role context
If a number lacks seniority, intent, or industry context — it’s just noise.
3. CRM + SEP readiness
Exporting a CSV won’t cut it. You need structured, mapped, routable records.
4. Regional nuance
Japan, India, Australia, Singapore, GCC — all behave differently.
A‑Leads wins because it builds mobile data into your workflow, not as an afterthought.
📱 Claim your first 50 verified mobile leads in APAC →
